Spot on. Analytic AI combined with machine learning has vast potential. It has already yielded breakthroughs in many areas, and will continue to do so.
Generative AI... produces slop and, more dangerously, misinformation. At great expense. And environmental destruction. The demand for data centres is almost entirely driven by generative AI.
Oppose those data centres
Things AI will be good at (even if it isn't yet):
Interpreting medical images - mammograms, X-rays, scans
Interpreting other images - eg, maintenance of motorway bridges used to require a scaffold for a person to take a look. Drone imaging plus AI will be more efficient.
Generating hypotheses - seeing patterns in data, for humans to question and interpret.
AI will learn to do these things better than humans.
Humans are still needed, to check and be accountable.
This is why I got crook at Firefox when they wanted to make blocking "AI" in Firefox also block machine translation.
@regordane @lauren Exactly. I try to keep repeating this everywhere, but it doesn't feel like the difference sinks in.
And it's super-important. Because the successes coming from (let's call it?) "expert" AI rubs off on stupid "autocomplete" AI where it's simply an outright lie.
Isn't that what people used to say about the web in the early days?
Your rant: "LLM generative AI SLOP: Creating sexualized and other deep fakes, automated phishing scams, misinformation...."
Isn't that what people used to say 30 years ago about the web?
they always wheel this one out. Researchers have been using machine learning for decades before the rise of AI slop (chemo- and bio-informatics).
It can't be said often enough, these data centres are about control, surveillance and ensuring stupidity.
Oh, and in any case, don't expect to get treated with the medicines discovered using specialised ML systems - you won't be able to afford them.