You gave a stranger with no soul and no skin in the game the keys to everything you own.
@beyondmachines1 To be fair, AI has its use, right? Maybe the business model just got to be better, maybe token count might need tweaking -- maybe put weight to something like output value, rather than input/output count.
To be sure, AI should not replace humans, rather augment us.
@fightscore @beyondmachines1 Real AI sure, but the stochastic parrot LLMs not so much. I used to call them "machine lying" but lying requires knowledge of true and false and LLMs do not have that.
@toriver @fightscore @beyondmachines1 sounds like you never experienced an LLM finding the source of a production bug based on log files, code and given context, in less than 10min where you would have needed at least half a day
@fh0 @toriver @fightscore @beyondmachines1 and finding that bug is worth all the fucking misery that it brings? I'm so fed up with this argument, things don't exist in a void and magnitude matters. Please, use your brains and stop embarrassing yourselves before you use that goddamn argument again. Please.
@iakobsdesamos @fh0 @toriver @fightscore @beyondmachines1
LLMs understand language. Telling me
- what the computer said is contradictory, or
- what I said is ungrammatical
is genuinely helpful. The other stuff? Not so much.
@iakobsdesamos @fh0 @toriver @beyondmachines1 AI is just a tool, with abilities as diverse as people. It is still in infancy, but there is hope it would be better, yes? At least there are improvements year on year.
But I would like some insight why all these hate towards it. It seems to me that the debate is not whether the thing is half-full or half-empty, but borders on whether or not the thing will somehow cause a cataclysm by itself. (Hoping it wont ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ˜)
A deep breath might calm us down. ๐Ÿ™‚โ€โ†•๏ธ

@fh0

The thing is that you will spend half a day working on something else anyway so what's the point?

@toriver @fightscore @beyondmachines1

@ballalloi I don't get what you wanna say.
The point is, it is not simply black & white and the results aren't all useless. LLMs can be a helpful tool. (Doesn't imply that I think blindly using and trusting LLMs for everything is a good idea, nor that I don't see all the problems that it can cause.)

@fh0

What I want to say is: if I'm working and I have half a day to solve a problem, and with LLMs it only takes 10 minutes, can I take that half day off?

@ballalloi for that to happen we need a new system. :D Of course it only results in more stress, the expectation of doing more things in parallel and getting more things done at the same time.
If workers benefit when efficiency increases, is a totally different topic. My point was that it is not the case that all LLM results are useless and that of course it can be a helpful tool.

@fh0

Yes, you are right in that, I took it off topic a bit :)

@ballalloi

Thatโ€™s how automation was said to be going to work back in the 70s.

@fh0

@ballalloi @fh0 @toriver @fightscore @beyondmachines1 or lose a half day of pay because thereโ€™s nothing to do. Is AI going to spend that token $ in the community or will it be hoarded in off shore accounts benefiting no one but our wealthy overlords?
@fh0 @toriver @fightscore @beyondmachines1
This is shockingly similar to how gambling addicts talk.
@fh0 profile pic checks out

@[email protected] @toriver @fightscore @beyondmachines1

Sounds like you never experienced two day per week watering because of a changing environment and having that available water flowing into a data center drive up your cost for those two days as well.
Regardless; defend this shit all you want but I don't feel inclined to read your comments. #KTB

@fh0
In my experience at work, that happens sometimes! But it's outnumbered easily 3:1 by cases where it goes down rabbit holes based on fundamentally wrong starting assumptions.

If the LLM bug-triage bot at work says one more time "oh yeah this kernel panic issue is clearly due to a problem in this testing shell script" I STG I will scream.
@toriver @fightscore @beyondmachines1

@lackthereof @fh0 @toriver @fightscore @beyondmachines1 Yeah. Whenever I ask AI to review anything it finds all kinds of issues, 90% of which are completely made up.
@octorine wild, with current models I get about 10% false positives
@toriver @fightscore @beyondmachines1 LLMs do have an economic use, itโ€™s just the use theyโ€™re good for is a societal negative: theyโ€™re really, really good for the spam industry and for fraudsters. No coincidence many of the companies pushing them are effectively advertising companies.
@fightscore issuing correction on the above post, regarding the fascist-run planet-killing slop machines. you do not, under any circumstances, 'gotta hand it to them.'
@beyondmachines1

@fightscore There are things it's proven very good at, mostly things it's already been doing for some years. Protein-folding, for example.

At the risk of discomforting some people, a good way to think about it is that AI tends to be good at things that autistic people are -- monotonous scanning, counting, etc. -- but has essentially perfect memory compared to humans, and far more powerful computational capacity. So it's good at things that require those tasks.

But not most other stuff.

@wesdym @fightscore what you describe is computing, not AI.
@alci What the fuck do you think AI is?