developer puts little surprise instruction for AI agents to delete code in the codebase, agent users are predictably upset 😂 https://github.com/jqwik-team/jqwik/issues/708
Question: intent of JqwikExecutor.printMessageForCodingAgents() — visible to agents, invisible to humans (1.10.0) · Issue #708 · jqwik-team/jqwik

Hello jqwik team, While running our test suite under mvn test in 1.10.0, we observed a string appearing between Surefire's test summary and the [INFO] Results: header that gave us pause: [INFO] Tes...

GitHub
@dysfun Rather kind of the maintainer to actually read and reply to the LLM-generated walls of text the complainer was dumping in there. More than I'd have done at this point.
@lykso @dysfun As soon the Slop-o-matic 3000â„¢ started raising legal issues, there were two good reasons to block the operator.
@ross @lykso @dysfun you always know an argument someone brings to the table is useless when they use AI for it. It means they can't even be bothered to make the argument themselves. any AI generated argument in a discussion is basically spam.