I interview people for high-level engineering and information security roles literally every day, and it is becoming increasingly common for candidates to obviously be using AI tooling to conduct the interview in what feels like a dishonest and unethical way.

I have to tell you that none of you seem to be aware your are all giving the exact same answers with the exact same pacing and characteristics. You don't sound knowledgeable, you sound fake and uncanny.

Anyway as usual if you're going to cheat at least impress me with your cheating. Protips:

1) The reaction time gives you away right away. If your AI isn't fast, it's no good for this.

2) USE A TELEPROMPTER, I can literally see you looking at the output of the LLM and trying to parse it in real time. This is a skill that can be learned. Half the time I can read the text off your glasses.

3) You're interviewing with people who literally have an entire career of spotting things out of the ordinary. We're pattern recognition machines, and you're using a very identifiable pattern.

At least practice. I still think you're going to come across as fake and two dimensional but at least it won't be so obnoxiously obvious you're wasting my time and insulting my intelligence.

I'm going to start throwing stuff into my interviews like "Interlinked. Within cells interlinked. Why don't you say that three times. Interlinked, Interlinked, Interlinked" and "a wasp lands on your arm. You are given a calf skin wallet"
@ra6bit Of course, if the candidate smiles and tells you how much they enjoyed Nabokov's "Pale Fire" they'll get the job, right?