"Organizations aren’t burning millions or hundreds of millions of dollars a year on AI because it’s good, they’re doing it because they are run by people who do not know what the fuck they’re doing.

Generative AI is catnip for hall monitors, snitches, toadies, and any other group that hates work and loves talking down to others. Put another way, it ingratiates losers who believe that learning to do or being good at something is a waste of time, because they deserve to just do what they want without any of that messy “effort.”

While I’m not saying every LLM user is an imbecile, they’re built to convince the mediocre and incurious that they’re remarkable, and it turns out that a great many of them run venture capital firms and Fortune 500 companies.

I also want to be clear that while there are sane and normal people who use these things, they’re mostly drowned out by a crowd of people that oscillate between bootlicking and regurgitating capitalist mythology in a way that makes it hard to trust anybody who spends significant amounts of time using an LLM.

One thing you’ll notice about the most moistened AI boosters is that they lack much degree of pride in their work. Everything they say must, at some point, compliment the mindless, unprofitable, unreliable tool underneath it — how “incredibly powerful” it is, how it’s “only getting better,” how it’s “only the beginning” of something that’s eaten over a trillion dollars and absorbed the majority of venture capital."

https://www.wheresyoured.at/the-revenge-of-the-business-idiot/

#AI #GenerativeAI #LLMs #AIBullshit #AIBubble #AIHype #Programming #SoftwareDevelopment

Revenge of The Business Idiot

If you liked this piece, you should subscribe to my premium newsletter. It’s $70 a year, or $7 a month, and in return you get a weekly newsletter that’s usually anywhere from 5,000 to 18,000 words, including vast, detailed analyses of NVIDIA, Anthropic and OpenAI’s

Ed Zitron's Where's Your Ed At
@remixtures And it's manna from heaven for MBAs who can issue prompts and get work-shaped output.
@phil_stevens @remixtures his latest on the pricing of AI is chef kiss btw.
@remixtures Part 1 of 2: Perhaps the problem ultimately is that our entire economy, founded in the early days of the Industrial Revolution, is inextricably geared towards growth: not merely successfully supplying a useful good or service indefinitely, but growth. This made sense when new technology was creating entirely new arenas that hadn't previously been possible. But arguably computer chips and the PCs and other devices they made possible was the last true innovation to come along.
@remixtures Part 2 of 2: So what happens when there are no more "growth industries"? When there are no startups that if you buy in at the beginning you can sell decades later for 20x what you paid? The answer apparently is to create the illusion that something is the Next Big Thing that will transform the world. But unfortunately the science fiction vision of steady progress towards ever-more advanced tech isn't panning out. Technology is apparently plateauing.
@60sRefugee @remixtures I think it is a combination of real tech Innovations becoming ever more difficult to achieve and a byproduct of the fanatic pursuit of growth being the devaluation of everything else. Where are the bright minds and resources to realize true innovation supposed to come from when quality of life and sustainability are in freefall?