I'm struggling with the criticism I'm getting for sharing upbeat #COVID19 news.

For years, I probed data and shared accurate analysis showing COVID risks were higher than most thought. Many people liked and reposted me.

Today, I share that COVID is far lower than it's been in six years after two years of consecutively declining surges, and people act like I'm a COVID minimizer.

Same guy, same data, same analysis. If you welcomed my concern, I hope you'd equally embrace my optimism. 1/2

@augieray "Optimism" about covid is able to be, and is, weaponised to oppress immunocompromised people.

It is used as the justification to scale back affordances to protect the vulnerable, and to force those people into situations that are a risk to them, but perhaps not so much for the abled population.

One might argue that expressing optimism about Covid is inherently unethical, and for a doctor, directly contradicts the "do no harm" principle.

@metaning if one can't see improvements in infectious risk as helpful and not harmful to immunocompromised people, that says more about your attitudes than it does the data or the risks.

@augieray "Optimism" about covid is what makes it impossible to see a dentist, because their staff may refuse to wear N95 respirators when you have to take yours off, because "Covid is over" and "Covid isn't so bad". Or, get trades in to your house, because even though you supply them with masks, they take them off when you're not looking.

It speaks to your attitude that you're not thinking from the perspective of people less fortunate than you.

@metaning @augieray Optimism (or pessimism for that matter) about anything can be weaponized by people that want to do as they please.
If anything, a lack of knowledge or empathy from those people is the problem. I don't think they take inspiration from someone being rightfully optimistic about improving COVID risk data to not wear masks. They already didn't do that when people were pessimistic.