@oantolin @chiply alright, it is that time!

https://toobnix.org/w/752ix2RNx5BijosuYtSGCv New extended cut archive !

#Live #interview with Omar about #emacs #embark + #lisp ..

#RSS subscribe to the recent #archive https://toobnix.org/feeds/videos.xml?accountId=580185 #peertube ! (I am told "use the peertube app").

#climateCrisis #haiku from @kentpitman and slak of #lambdaMOO . #chat in https://lambda.moo.mud.org/ as always using your favourite #mud client !

#lispGames #springLispGameJam @mdhughes

@nosrednayduj is busy squaredancing tonight.

Extended archive has an extra 15 minutes.
https://toobnix.org/w/752ix2RNx5BijosuYtSGCv
Subscribe via #RSS : https://toobnix.org/feeds/videos.xml?accountId=580185

Incredible notes.
https://appdot.net/@mdhughes/116604261654416157
smj's song viz @northernlights
https://appdot.net/@mdhughes/116604297422821289

@oantolin @chiply @kentpitman @mdhughes @nosrednayduj

@screwlisp
While waiting on their reply, "anything can have a topological model!" -- well, so long as we're talking things with invariants over continuity (note that that includes continuous state spaces), neighborhoods ('nearness' is definable and not too badly behaved), or deformation invariance, and also complexes from gluing such things together.

In your case you probably particularly loved manifolds.

Or something like that. Maybe..

@oantolin @northernlights @chiply @kentpitman @mdhughes @nosrednayduj

It seems to me we ought to have a space first before defining or constructing its topology (or is that approach out of fashion nowadays?).
So, what is an Emacs space and what are its points?

I'd rather listen to other people's suggestions first, and in any case mine are too raw yet.

@dougmerritt @screwlisp @oantolin @northernlights @chiply @kentpitman @mdhughes @nosrednayduj

@vnikolov @dougmerritt @screwlisp @oantolin @northernlights @chiply @kentpitman @mdhughes @nosrednayduj

The space is editors. Editors map sequences of key strokes or mouse movements to text.

Emacs is therefore a set of such mappings, with different Emacses roughly distinguished by different configuration files. One Emacs may be transformed into another by altering the set of modules loaded and key-mappings defined. I’m not sure how to talk about continuity, here.

Note that vi and vim become points in the Emacs space as shown by the existence of things like the vile package that makes Emacs behave like those editors.

I am wondering if multiple buffers adds a dimensionality to this space.

Or maybe editors plus configuration form systems for transforming one text into another, and that’s how to think about it.