"You have to have faith in the system!"
Why? o.O
I don't think I've ever seen it put so straightforwardly but:
Even if Democrats somehow manage to take over Congress or the White House in the future, they are going to have to break the law in order to ensure Trump and Republicans don't get away with it and aren't able to do it again.
Presidential pardons are going to have to be treated as worthless. Corrupt SCOTUS rulings ignored. You have to uproot all of it and throw it away.
Or this will just happen again.
Are Democrats going to do that?
No. So? What's the point?
The constitutional crisis isn't in the future. It came and went a while ago.
We're in full breach of contract.
The VBNMW people in particular are saying we should elect Biden 2.0 so they personally can have a few years reprieve of "boring" centrist governance before the Nazis bounce back stronger than ever.
And if some of us get thrown under the bus in the process, so be it.
Which is all Biden 1.0 was about, too.
@davidP The president (and the courts) are as powerful as they are because Congress largely abdicated its responsibilities.
And because it's easier to win the White House than it is majorities in Congress and one person in control of the federal bureaucracy, with nonexistent Congressional oversight and no legal guardrails, can do virtually whatever they want with the US government.
The system is an abomination.
@davidP so.. theres a DOJ and JD.
Justice Department is the actual judicial branch
DOJ is just the name for the lawyers of the executive branch. They are a legal fiction as an extension of the President's person
The problem is that Congress, the Legislative, the final leg, passed a law in 1870 moving the prosecution of all federal crimes to it.. and hence to the Executive from the Judicial
so now the executive is legally supposed to police itself.. a king
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Department_of_Justice
@gwynnion doesn't mean you shouldn't vote though. Hungary got orban out, y'all can get trump out.
There's no guarantee of success, but not voting is giving up.
Have you considered the utility of the Second Amendment?