Phone privacy WARNING: Supposedly to control telemarketing calls, the FCC is considering requiring ID, a verified address, a prior phone number, and a police background check to get a phone number.

Hopefully the 3ed party reseller prepaid vendors who do not require ID would respond by selling data-only plans and setting them up not to use SMS and thus not to require a phone number at all.

Signal could then respond to this by allowing new accounts to be activated without a phone number. A phone number is needed to make voice calls. It is not needed to use Signal except at setup at this time and there are other encrypted messenger systems that don't use phone numbers at all. The web doesn't need a phone number for sites not demanding any form of verification or not using a login. For 15 years I used the Internet without phone service, I may well be going back to that.

If the ID requirement passes, I will probably NOT be keeping phone service unless I can get a foreign country SIM and use it in roaming mode.

Hopefully a year or two would pass before they realize making this work requires also having coffeeshops, libraries, universities, stores etc demand ID to use the wifi.

This garbage is on top of the age verification crap and Google's plans to integrate Play Integrity checking into recaptha.

The FCC needs to remember that most telemarketing alls are already illegal and do NOT originate inside the US. If they do, it would require a data link from a boiler room in another country to a business class landline here

#ID #privacy

Imagine trying to police abortion related travel or protests when the people the cops are trying to track don't have phone service at all to track. Try tracking a person using a paper map to travel from Austin, Texas to California for an abortion. Try tracking wheatpasted fliers and mesh networks that come and go to determine who attended a protest.

Speaking of mesh networks, they may be about to become far more important. People will set up mesh networks bridged to the Internet by black market, international, or sattelite phone service in cities, and whoever is the least spicy person on a block can set up landline internet service, then put a wifi router at the top of a tree and the whole block uses it and splits up the bill.

We'll also likely see a CB comeback, plus "freebanding" or two-way pirate radio which the FCC REALLY won't like.

Currenly in many countries, data-only e-sims with no phone service can connect. One provider I checked out (no link as this would violate no-ads policy and also place them at risk) does not allow outgoing SMS to ensure their service is never used for SMS spam.

Since their entire business does not ever provide voice calling or outbound SMS to anyone, they are presumably not classed as a "phone" carrier and slip past these laws. To block these services would probably require a country to block all international data roaming, which can cause tourists not to return.

A note on bridging mesh networks with registered internet: Whoever puts their name and address on the connection would need a way to force all connections to the outside Internet to use Tor and drop all outbound non-Tor packets. This is to protect them from being charged.

@LukefromDC > A note on bridging mesh networks with registered internet: Whoever puts their name and address on the connection would need a way to force all connections to the outside Internet to use Tor and drop all outbound non-Tor packets. This is to protect them from being charged.

Tor actively supports such an operational mode, it can be observed in Whonix.