Phone privacy WARNING: Supposedly to control telemarketing calls, the FCC is considering requiring ID, a verified address, a prior phone number, and a police background check to get a phone number.

Hopefully the 3ed party reseller prepaid vendors who do not require ID would respond by selling data-only plans and setting them up not to use SMS and thus not to require a phone number at all.

Signal could then respond to this by allowing new accounts to be activated without a phone number. A phone number is needed to make voice calls. It is not needed to use Signal except at setup at this time and there are other encrypted messenger systems that don't use phone numbers at all. The web doesn't need a phone number for sites not demanding any form of verification or not using a login. For 15 years I used the Internet without phone service, I may well be going back to that.

If the ID requirement passes, I will probably NOT be keeping phone service unless I can get a foreign country SIM and use it in roaming mode.

Hopefully a year or two would pass before they realize making this work requires also having coffeeshops, libraries, universities, stores etc demand ID to use the wifi.

This garbage is on top of the age verification crap and Google's plans to integrate Play Integrity checking into recaptha.

The FCC needs to remember that most telemarketing alls are already illegal and do NOT originate inside the US. If they do, it would require a data link from a boiler room in another country to a business class landline here

#ID #privacy

Here is the text of the FCC's document:

FCC Proposes Strengthening ‘Know-Your-Customer’ Rules
Commission Aims to Enhance Consumer Protection and Stop Illegal Calls Before They
Reach American Households and Businesses

WASHINGTON, April 30, 2026—In an effort to stop illegal calls before they ever reach the
American people, the Federal Communications Commission today adopted an item seeking to
strengthen its “Know-Your-Customer” (KYC) rules for voice service providers. By screening new
and renewing customers, originating voice service providers are in the best position to prevent
scammers and other bad actors from flooding telecommunications networks with illegal calls.
Stopping illegal calls is the FCC’s top consumer protection priority, and the agency is taking a
holistic approach by attacking them at every point in their lifecycle. This includes stopping illegal
calls before they enter the phone network, requiring providers to block unwanted or illegal calls, and
giving consumers more information about the calls they receive.
In today’s Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, the FCC is seeking comment on clearer, more
rigorous customer verification standards. Potential measures include new requirements for
providers to verify customer identities—including name, address, government ID, and alternative
phone numbers—before enabling service.

Commission rules already require originating providers to take “affirmative, effective” measures to
“know its customers,” and ensure that its services are not used to originate illegal call traffic. Yet
some providers are not doing enough, resulting in more illegal calls that defraud Americans and
making it difficult to hold the criminals making these call accountable.

The Commission also seeks comment on how to assess and enforce violations of the KYC rules
based on the number of illegal calls placed to ensure that penalties are in line with the harm caused
by callers. The Commission also asks how enhancing KYC requirements can prevent or deter other
criminal uses of communications networks.

Action by the Commission April 30, 2026 by Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (FCC 26-27).
Chairman Carr, Commissioners Gomez and Trusty approving. Chairman Carr and Commissioner
Trusty issuing separate statements.
CG Docket Nos. 17-59, 02-278
###
Media Contact: [email protected] / (202) 418-0500
@FCC / www.fcc.gov

@LukefromDC Rather than surveillance (KYC) shit I'd rather they just bring back minimum per-call and per-minute fees for any calls into telephone network. Spam and scams would all dry up if they actually had to pay.

@dalias Two places we may get a break, based on reading that looong document:

1: the main target appears to be high volume call centers. Question is will they carpet bomb the city to get the arms factory so to speak, or limit themselves to the named target. Ugly discussions of "national security" and "other criminal use of the network" raise fears of the former.

2:The document repeated mentions "voice service providers." Hopefully that means entire companies offering only data and not phone call service will slip past this shit.