So I was looking for this book to show people as an example of over-the-top buzzword compliance:

https://www.routledge.com/Artificial-Intelligence-Machine-Learning-and-Blockchain-in-Quantum-Satellite-Drone-and-Network/Subramanian-Dhyani-Kumar-Gill/p/book/9781032168050

I was shocked when my phone showed me this search result. Much of the fields that do exist is speculative even while consisting of active legitimate areas of study. It seems to have taken my search for my best recollection of the book title as a call to propose research projects in applying quantum machine learning to affairs involving cryptocurrency, drones, etc.

Why not just propose a swarm of drones that goes round trying to sell things to people accepting cryptocurrency as payment and using satellite services as the network uplinks? It's not even that hard to hit every buzzword at once if allowed to drift into stereotypical realms of science fiction coming down the organisational hierarchy as engineering requirements. Here the science fiction is primarily in the realm of acting as a salesperson in its interactions with humans and the majority of the buzzwords are covered by isolated aspects of the use case not interacting with the rest of it all.

There are ways to use these things as research assistants when talking through early versions of ideas, but that's not what I was expecting from the plain old web search bar. I also think the human language generation is probably being overused and things should probably be substantially more transparently mechanical so non-technical people don't get the ELIZA effect and weep for things that were never people or anything close.