I'm as fascinated by the Artemis II mission as many other people, but as scientist I'm frustrated that experts interviewed about it in the media are rarely asked to justify the truly astronomical cost. So far the program is reported to have cost $93Bn, with the direct costs of this mission alone amounting to more than $4Bn. I'm perhaps particularly sensitive to this because I'm frequently asked to justify funding three orders of magnitude smaller that we have used to improve knowledge of how the Antarctic ice sheet will respond to climate change and contribute to future sea-level rise.
@PoLaRobs it's OK, USA spends that every hour just keeping the fleet in the Gulf, around 20k$/second. https://irancost.com/ is one of the more entertaining ones.
There's enough money for food, shelter, healthcare, accommodation, education, and a comfortable retirement. It's just not shared correctly.
So yes, it must be *beyond galling* to be a scientist trying to save this beautiful blue dot from becoming literally uninhabitable.

