No mas, #KamalaHarris! America needs new! Not #Kamala, #Gavin, or any other tired ass career #Democrat with no vision for the country.

For context, I worked at a high level in a swing stage in' 24. The #Dems need a friggin' overhaul.

@AARS

I think we should let primary voters decide what the party needs. I for one like career professionals, especially seeing as how every non career politician has been an unmitigated disaster.

@HakeemG P.S. The problem with the current regime is not their lack of experience. This is a second term president and a former senator. The problem is that they're trash human beings, corrupt to their core.

@AARS

Yeah, that's part of their problem but they also don't have any experience or expertise and I'm not just talking about the current regime. I'm talking about every time some non-politician gets elected they s*** the bed.

@HakeemG That statement is fiction. It's also dangerous for democracy to have the view that only career politicians can lead. There's immense value to be added by folks who haven't been molded inside a broken system. Look at the Dems now, sitting on their hands with no power and no clue what to do. I 💯 don't want more of the same. I'm willing to be open enough to admit that things are completely broken on both sides, and there needs to be a new way forward.

@AARS

It's fiction that Trump having 5 years in politics is inexperienced? JFC, man get a hold of yourself. His secretary of war is another example a failed Major doesn't become the Secretary of Defense.

Oh lordie completely broken on both sides bullshit. Stop sniffing Bernie glue.

@HakeemG You're the one on my posts blowing a gasket. The fiction I referred to had nothing to do with Trump. It was the part of your reply that spoke to inexperience in general. Stop arguing with me about Trump! It's a ridiculous retort! I've worked for the #Dems my whole life. I'm articulating the fact that experience inside a broken party is not validating or a selling point. If you have a problem with that point of view, I really DGAF.

Again, peace be with you. Let's see if you take it.

@HakeemG lol. I detest Bernie Sanders. I've actually worked with him. He's insufferable. Are you not embarrassed enough yet? Your simplistic retorts and insults don't dent actual intelligence and experience. Let me teach you one more thing while I'm at it:

When voters reject you, during a general election and by a wide margin, it's generally not a good idea to run again for the same office. Check the electoral history on that, or try to land another thoughtless remark. Or... just stop now.

@AARS

You mean like the last two presidents? Joe Biden got less than 1% of the vote in the 2008 presidential primary, then he ran again in 2020 and won. Trump lost in 2020 by 4 million votes and got elected in 2024.

The only people who should be embarrassed here are the ones claiming Biden's regime and these Nazis are the same, just like the insufferable Bernie, and voters who were stupid enough to elect Trump again. Kamala 2028!

@HakeemG reading is fundamental. I wrote "general" election. You're babbling about primaries. You, sir, are punching above your weight.

@AARS

Yes Trump lost the general election. I read it, I was just pointing out that voters aren't consistent. Anyway good luck to your candidate of choice, which is whom? I'll be voting for Kamala 2028!

@HakeemG, you're wrong again, but I'm grateful for your exit. Because it is an important point in electoral history, I'll reiterate:

I wasn't talking about Trump because he didn't lose "by a wide margin" in a "general election." Who did? K.A.M.A.L.A. This is not limited to presidential general elections.

I'll say again that I worked on the Harris-Walz campaign at a high level in a swing state. America can and will do better. Happy voting 🗳! 👋🏿

@AARS

Nationwide, Donald Trump lost the popular vote by approximately 7,059,526 votes.

a shift of just 42,918 votes across those three states would have altered the outcome of the election.

Nationwide, Kamala Harris lost the popular vote by approximately 2,284,338 votes.

a shift of approximately 231,470 votes would have been required to change the outcome of the Electoral College.

@HakeemG, if the popular vote won presidential elections, Hillary would've been POTUS. Donald lost after days of counting. Kamala had no chance. The election was called before the night was over.

I'm building the first decentralized, community-owned blue chip. So I'm gonna get back to that.