LØL

@tlayoyo
ICL Computer punch card operators expected slashed Oh O Ø, but other computer system operators (reading handwritten coding sheets) assumed it was a slashed zero 0. I can type Ø (The Scandi letter) on Linux but not slashed zero, though there may be a method.

The ICL made somewhat more sense as the Ø Character existed before computers, Except it's a Runic / Nordic / Scandi O, not the English O with a slash.

The Wikipedia disambiguation is 100% correct!

And why there was no confusion between I and 1? 👀 i to this date struggle more with this two characters

@tlayoyo
or capital I and small l on sans.
The 1, I and l are not ambiguous in many hand scripts. The 1 in some countries is like a closed up 7 and 7 often has a stroke. The l would have a slight tail.

The default sans-serif fonts are terrible.

Though many typewriters, especially portable. had no 0 and 1. Also the " and ' was invented for typewriters. You could create characters by backspace and overprint and this was on Wordstar etc.

@raymaccarthy @tlayoyo yeah, sans-serif is overrated and 90% of its use is misuse; on the laptop I apply generous userContent.css fixes, on the smartphone I’m SOL

@tlayoyo imagine the chaos back in the day if you needed to type out your alphanumeric password one of these typewriters.

https://www.daskeyboard.com/blog/why-did-old-typewriters-not-have-a-number-one-key/

Why did old typewriters not have a number one key? - Das Keyboard Mechanical Keyboard Blog

When looking at old typewriters, you’ll notice the key for number one is missing. It’s not because someone took it out or because it broke. Here is another one: So did you find out why the one key is missing? Here is the answer: the number one key was not implemented by design. Instead, the...

Das Keyboard Mechanical Keyboard Blog