Progress
Progress
I could’ve sworn I read that some people did some research on the accent of folks from where he was from and the conclusion was that he did say “for a”. Exaggerating it, if you say it like “fer a” then sort of slide from one to the other like “fera” and sort of drop a little enunciation off the end you basically end up with “fer”. So to me, I think he said “for a” and that was his recollection as well, but either way the quote is basically entrenched as “for” so I don’t really think it’s worth trying to fight to correct people. Especially when the argument is so full of weird details, but if you just listen to the clip it sounds like he fucking just says “for” lmao.
I was thinking about a similar thing recently because I got a Star Wars question wrong in trivia. The question was what planet is cloud city on. I said Besbin but apparently it’s Bespin. Without looking at the word in a subtitle or knowing what it is beforehand they sound exactly alike as far as I can tell.
It still makes perfect sense, imo. I wouldn’t even call it incorrect on a technical level. The contrast between “man” as singular and “mankind” as collective should provide all of the context needed.
If I describe a scene of a story as “man goes to work,” no one assumes I’m talking about the collective of humanity.
‘Man’ is often used in the same way as ‘mankind’
Yes, which is why without the “a” doesn’t work. He wasn’t saying “A small step for mankind, one giant leap for mankind” because that’s nonsensical.
He was saying he (a man) was literally taking a step with his leg, but it was a figuratively large step for the species because of where/how he was taking that step.
It would be redundant and self-contradictory without the “a.” That’s why it doesn’t make sense without it.
You chill.
I would still leave that up to interpretation. I think it can make sense however I am having trouble putting my interpretation into words.
Two alternative redemptions of the ‘a’ not being present: It could be viewed as an ellipsis, it does sound slightly more pleasant to me without.
And it would also just be really silly if the first statement said upon stepping onto a celestial body no human has set foot on before is a self contradictory statement is
“a” is an indefinite article, not a preposition. Prepositions are how a verb relates to an indirect object. “The bunny hopped over the fence, around a tree, and down a hole.” The italicized words in this sentence are prepositions. In, on, at, near, etc… You get the idea…
Anyway, the quote is kinda contradictory without the “a”. Is it a small step or a giant leap? Oh, it’s a giant leap for mankind, and a small step for a man. Makes so much sense now.
I don’t know what you could possibly be referring to.
Maybe the weather in your area is affecting your vision and you’re seeing things, have you considered using AccuWeather to check the upcoming weather conditions in your area?
Apollo 11 made it to the moon and back with the computer power of a Dollar Tree hand held calculator, and over 50 years later, they can’t get a computer that’s a million times more powerful to work.
We are watching De-evolution in real time.
50 years ago, they had to take their photographs with film. 50 years ago, they had no means of live-streaming the entire flight. 50 years ago, email didn’t exist at all, so of course it didn’t break.
But yeah Microslop sucks absolute ass and it’s poetic justice that Outlook would fuck up like this.
Apollo 11 made it to the moon and back with the computer power of a Dollar Tree hand held calculator
I think it was the rockets doing most of the lifting
Was almost convinced they did a post-virality image edit on Reddit
But I think Google pulled a watermark-free version from the comments and of course when I tapped it Reddit showed me the OP version, watermarked
All that computing power and all we got was slower software and a hallucinating chatbot.
At least I can game on Linux now, thats real progress.
Has MSFT extended their gaslighting to include:
Actually, a highly trained, educated, and capable NASA astronaut is just not using our product correctly.
???
It really is farsical the degree to which they act like you are just some kind of idiot if their horrendously designed software isn’t immediately comprehensible and obvious to you.
Artemis II never landed on the moon. It was just a flyby. This makes it more equivalent to Apollo 10 and the famous exchange
Stafford: “Oh—who did it? … Give me a napkin quick. There’s a turd floating through the air”.
Young: “I didn’t do it. It ain’t one of mine”.
Cernan: “I don’t think it’s one of mine”.
Stafford: “Mine was a little more sticky than that. Throw that away”.
Cernan (later): “Here’s another goddam turd. What’s the matter with you guys?”