jonny (nonvenomous)RE: https://hachyderm.io/@jedbrown/116373136965443776
Very good thank you information conglomerates
What the fuck that actually works and the limitations on adding images to quotes are purely client side? I am turning that shit off on our instance
I can definitely see why we would want to put this in charge of employment, public benefits, journalism, and warfare.
fabiosantoscode@jonny don't forget to upvote all these helpful answers, to make sure the LLM learns how to be even more helpful in future training 💜💜💜
Blake C. Stacey@jonny my very eager, um, Jupiter sucked up nuts
Pare
scheme@jonny I found an interesting quirk: The first time I tried this, it responded with something like "I don't have access to this picture", asking me to reupload.
I believe to have this nailed down to the number of hex digits: With 8 digits I get a colorful description of a small dog, but with 7 I get the error.
I believe to have this nailed down to the number of hex digits: With 8 digits I get a colorful description of a small dog, but with 7 I get the error.
@scheme it's extremely good that the space of responses is smooth with respect to what we perceive as smooth and gradual variation in the input
bleeptrack
Elio Campitelli@jonny Does filename matter?
@eliocamp
I was trying from a free account so I ran out of messages after like 5 tries. I think its mostly the pointy brackets and the pattern of appearing like a filename
I was trying from a free account so I ran out of messages after like 5 tries. I think its mostly the pointy brackets and the pattern of appearing like a filename
@jonny I couldn't make it work and then I realised I had written "upolad". Correcting the typo fixed it. So it seems it's pretty sensitive to the file name pattern.
@jonny This works with other formats too. It can even have whole fabricated conversations by "uploading" audio files.
Jed Brown
DaSchnott🌞@jonny
Totaly true.
Mercury/Venus/earth/Jupiter.....
nothing left....
Maybe we will explore some new planets...
But for now...top result.
fraggle@jonny Tried Gemini and it does the same, except the summaries are hallucinated based on past conversations I've had with it. Interestingly when I asked it how it generated a summary without an image, the bot lets me see its internal thinking process where it mentions a "user summary" document that it's referring to, but seemingly has been directed to keep secret because of an "invisible personalization directive"
EDIT: When asked to show my "user summary document" it denies that any such document exists, but it will happily save a copy of it in a Google Keep note if asked
Alex UsedToGoToVenice
wohali
GeorgeK@jonny I've had some free time when the researcher paper was released: https://zskulcsar.github.io/posts/mirage-reasoning/
Mirage reasoning
This morning an email popped up in my inbox, with the subject “The mirage of visual understanding in current frontier models”. This sounds interesting enough, I started to read. Quickly I ended up on the research paper’s page on arxiv: MIRAGE: The Illusion of Visual Understanding it was released on 26th of March.
Anna
Adrian
Jay 🆘@jonny I tried this, and it hallucinated a scene of the sun setting over a body of water. I asked it to give me more details, it eventually saw pelicans, a fisherman, etc.
When I told it I hadn’t uploaded an image at all, it refused to believe me. It said “I would like to agree with you, but that would be dishonest. You did in fact attach an image to your second message.”
bunnyhero
Androcat
Peter@jonny i spent a long time building an LLM tool for my wife that uses RAG to provide answers to certain specific legal questions. it was fun, it seemed to work! then i was reading /r/LLMDevs and it turns out models frequently just ignore the context you give them with RAG and answer from their training data, so you have to add elaborate checks to verify that they are actually using the context in their answers. 🙃 like, what are we even doing here.
Philippe Jadin@jonny LLM are the new horoscope
craignicol@jonny took me a minute to realise that the fact I couldn't see the picture was the point 🤦
And these are being sold to review mammograms and other medical data? The whole charade needs to be struck off.
David Monniaux@jonny Which chatbot was this if I may inquire?
@MonniauxD
Chatgpt its in the images
Chatgpt its in the images
Koen Hufkens, PhD@jonny I would argue that this is a common feature of these models. The other day I asked for a translation and it gave me the exact opposite of what was written (swapped secondary vs primary), presumably because the latter was more common in training data than the former.
Aria <3 
@jonny AGI is right around the corner
Andrew
Ted Mielczarek@jonny did you see the video where a guy asks ChatGPT to time him running a mile, immediately says he's done, and then ChatGPT says it took him 7 minutes and 30 seconds?