@tante @ai6yr I wrote about this yesterday, Mastodon's decision to voluntarily downsize in the face of AI. I think it's sad, but I'll take the clue and start unfollowing.
@buckfiftyseven @tante So let me get this right. You are an AI fan, and you don't like people who are not fans of AI (for the reasons in that post), so you are unfollowing people who don't like AI? That's fine, I guess. 🤔

@ai6yr @tante That's a very shallow way to represent it. I would say I understand American copyright law, and I understand the contradiction of people who run ad blockers while claiming they support copyright law and the contradiction of people who run ad blockers saying that AI training is stealing.

Public domain exists. Open source exists. Creative Commons exists. And the body of law on fair use goes back quite a long time.

@buckfiftyseven @tante Ah, so you are saying if you are using an ad blocker, you are as wrong as the AI companies?
@ai6yr @tante it seems pretty similar doesn't it? Taking what you want from a website, regardless of the host's intentions?
@buckfiftyseven @ai6yr @tante no. copyright law is bullshit. the problem is power. like in every situation. poor people stealing from the rich: cool. rich people stealing from the poor: fucked.

@3Fingers @ai6yr @tante I definitely got that vibe already, that many on Mastodon, and to a lesser extent Bluesky, approach AI as a class issue.

Seems strange, both because it's what AI has been building towards for the last 70 years. No surprises here that the first command would be "ok, read everything."

But also because Moore's law applies. All of this will be local and distributed over time.

We're actually quite lucky that there are no binding patents or copyrights on AI.

@buckfiftyseven why do you think Moore's law applies here ...?

@YinYinFalcon AI runs on memory and operations. Memory and operations have been scaling with Moore's law since it was coined.

There are also now many large public training sets. People download them and run them now with current tech hw.

@buckfiftyseven

but that "law" cannot apply forever since it's only an empirical observation of the past

we will (or already have) reached the physical limits there