https://smallsheds.garden/blog/2026/on-the-acceptance-of-genai/
@ai6yr @tante That's a very shallow way to represent it. I would say I understand American copyright law, and I understand the contradiction of people who run ad blockers while claiming they support copyright law and the contradiction of people who run ad blockers saying that AI training is stealing.
Public domain exists. Open source exists. Creative Commons exists. And the body of law on fair use goes back quite a long time.
@3Fingers @ai6yr @tante I definitely got that vibe already, that many on Mastodon, and to a lesser extent Bluesky, approach AI as a class issue.
Seems strange, both because it's what AI has been building towards for the last 70 years. No surprises here that the first command would be "ok, read everything."
But also because Moore's law applies. All of this will be local and distributed over time.
We're actually quite lucky that there are no binding patents or copyrights on AI.
@YinYinFalcon AI runs on memory and operations. Memory and operations have been scaling with Moore's law since it was coined.
There are also now many large public training sets. People download them and run them now with current tech hw.
but that "law" cannot apply forever since it's only an empirical observation of the past
we will (or already have) reached the physical limits there