@maxleibman Not to start a fight, but the community went on a week-long witch hunt against Cory Doctorow because he dared to use AI

@budududuroiu That’s not why people were mad at Cory Doctorow. They were mad because in the same piece he called anti-AI sentiment “purity culture,” framing it as reflexive, unthinking moralizing.

If not for that element, it barely would have been a ripple. Witness that feature article a few months ago about how Ed Zitron, one of the leading critics of AI, also represented AI companies in his marketing firm. That was way more salacious and barely got any play here at all.

@maxleibman really not here to fight, so please don't take as such, but...

> Using LLMs isn’t always popular with the cool crowd, Cory knows that. And he wants to defend his (quite modest) use, which I understand:
> Nobody likes their problematic behavior being pointed out to them. But as outlined: Life’s complicated.

Why would using an LLM be "problematic", unless there was a purity culture at play?

I digress, Mastodon is a great platform that allows one to curate their own feed to their liking, sometimes there's cross interactions between bubbles of Mastodon, so far, anecdotally, the cross interaction that bled into the ML/AI research space has been pretty negative, for no reason. Some people think that negativity is good, and that the ML/AI research space does not belong here. I guess that's where defederation comes in.

https://tante.cc/2026/02/20/acting-ethical-in-an-imperfect-world/#:~:text=Nobody%20likes%20their%20problematic%20behavior%20being%20pointed%20out%20to%20them%2E%20But%20as%20outlined%3A%20Life%E2%80%99s%20complicated%2E

Acting ethically in an imperfect world

Life is complicated. Regardless of what your beliefs or politics or ethics are, the way that we set up our society and economy will often force you to act against them: You might not want to fly somewhere but your employer will not accept another mode of transportation, you want to eat vegan but are […]

Smashing Frames

@budududuroiu @maxleibman

Mastodon has a lot of queer people on it. Many LLM's are actively being trained to perpetuate disinformation against queer people and are assisting in the trans genocide. They're teaching a generation of people that trans people are bad and dangerous.

"Purity culture" has also become a buzzword that's used against feminists and other forms of progressives.

We're resistant to LLM's because they're actively making our lives worse, more dangerous, harder, etc.

@CordiallyChloe @maxleibman understood, and I think it's commendable that people want to protect their communities from those biases and negative aspects.

Maybe my view is too cynical, but most people will use LLMs, and will engage with those biases, I just think it's less bad that biases favourable to the groups I support rather than unfavourable. That requires participation into the research sphere, which, would be nice to happen on the fediverse rather than just Twitter and Substack

@budududuroiu @CordiallyChloe @maxleibman but also, have you seen what happens to dissenting voices in the research sphere, especially when they come from marginalized people? Timnit Gebru leaps immediately to mind, for example.

@nonehitwonder @budududuroiu @maxleibman

Yeah, trans voices are especially pushed out. People already don't take us seriously and constantly talk over us. Now they have an entire product that does the ignoring/talking over for them.