I learned a new word today, cryptogyny.

I’m going to have to sit with it for a bit.

It’s not that I was unfamiliar with the context. Practically anywhere you care to look there are women whose work has been ignored, hidden or stolen. Women who’ve not been given the credit they deserved, or very quickly been dropped.

I mean, I really would like to know why I never learned about Emmy Noether in school, right next to Albert Einstein, even though he recognised her genius.

Cryptogyny. Use it when you need to.

https://olivia.science/cryptogyny/

Via @olivia

Cryptogyny

On the systematic obfuscation of women's contributions.

https://olivia.science
@hypostase @olivia it's because boys don't realize they can have women as role models. it is not obvious and needs to be taught.

@lritter @hypostase @olivia 💯 this is part of the problem

I grew up reading a lot of sci-fi, which at the time^ skewed extremely far towards “male / masc protagonists are the only protagonists” – many young girls & women have always been able to imagine ourselves as the hero(ine) & write ourselves into the stories out of sheer necessity (yes it’s not ideal ‘coz “if you can’t see it you can’t be it” is frequently true, but many of us managed)

but $deity forbid there’s a sci-fi story with a female / femme protagonist that becomes popular – many young boys & men get an attack of the vapours and start bleating about it being “unrelatable” 🙄 (i.e. they finally stumbled on something in the world that didn’t centre them) 😮‍💨
 
 
 
^ yes, still now, but a tiny bit less so

@itgrrl @hypostase @olivia true.

something messes many of us boys up and numbs our receptiveness. is it our dna? our hormones? i don't know.

i took LSD when i was 20 and it opened my heart first, made it visible to me; the heart then opened the mind. i distinctly had the intuition then that most girls don't need this. their human interfaces work "out of the box".

but i absolutely speak feelings as a second language.