Aaaaahhhhhh ! One of my favourite papers, which is about the efficient use of water by plants, has just been cited in this sentence "[...] as stress-induced flower or seed abortion is typically irreversible (Brendel, 2021[...]". There is zero information in my paper about flower or seed abortion. Such wrong citations are actually nearly more the rule than the exception now, but I get §&$%"&% every time : did they not read my paper ? Why cite it then ? Do they pick random papers, just for more citations ? Have they even read the title ?
#AcademicChatter

@olibrendel

Do they pick random papers, just for more citations ? Well, yes. This happens in my field as well, though more tangentially (e.g., right topic, slightly wrong conclusion).

@olibrendel A misquotation that misrepresents your work warrants a correction. Would be entirely reasonable to email the authors, cc'ing the journal editor. Alternatively, a @PubPeer comment would be in order.