It’s been a weird couple days; I keep running into this talking point that “journalists won’t use Mastodon unless we incentivize engagement farming”.

Meanwhile I’m having a *great* experience here, because I use it to— I dunno— actually talk to people and form relationships?

I reject the premise that mastodon isn’t useful for reporters. I think it’s more accurate that modern news orgs use social media in purely extractive ways.

You might get more reporters that way, but you won’t like them.

@Haste How are you defining journalists? For me a journalist is someone like @briankrebs Not many around anymore, I gave up on NPR over a decade ago because quality and depth were gone, despite them still retaining some real journalists, they weren't allowed to work as such. I suspect Brian has much deeper understanding and insights into the issue than myself with his background and expertise.
@CliffsEsport @briankrebs Well Krebs is literally an investigative journalist so I confess I’m not 100% sure the distinction you’re making. (Incidentally I read his work and enjoy it immensely)
@Haste @briankrebs my point was many so called journalist now don't meet my definition. Wasn't clear to me how you defined it, as in anyone working for online or print company doing articles? I really don't know of any big orgs that really meet my personal criteria anymore. BBC is only one I follow via RSS anymore and even there small podcasts/youtubes are often faster and higher quality. And I was trying to make clear I think they are out there just no jobs for them at big orgs anymore.
@CliffsEsport @briankrebs That’s true. The layoffs have been unreal. Folks are probably not too picky about employment right now.