I just consulted 54 trillion "people" who agree that this is idiotic.
I just consulted 54 trillion "people" who agree that this is idiotic.
You know what? I can make shit up too and I'll do it cheaper than an AI company.
@jawarajabbi @Natasha_Jay
> I can make shit up too and I'll do it cheaper than an AI
No and no. Was falsifying the raw material so easy no single person could catch it and get dissertations retracted.
And if you want to fill out 1,008 questionnaires for $100 I think I might have a gig for ya ;)
@benny
> with a little python script
Nope. Video proof of protein filling it with their hand and pen, on paper ;)
@benny
> Where would it get the protein from?
Thats why I said about a gig for the protein who stated that it would be fast and cheap.
Problem is real.
We need to find a way to detect the falsification of survey questionnaires. We can statistically identify the work of a dishonest surveyor, but if that person uses a "silicon sampling" bot, statistical methods will fail. That is why we are starting to record the human hand filling out the paper form, as proof that the pollster actually interviewed various people and did not just made the survey on their sofa casually talking with a bot.
I mean... is this expression for people as "protein" common in tech or did you just make it up? Because as a person I find the expression a little... surprising?