I regret to inform you (again) that Dave Winer is still wrong.
http://scripting.com/2026/04/05/130334.html?title=theDiscourseAboutWordpress
I regret to inform you (again) that Dave Winer is still wrong.
http://scripting.com/2026/04/05/130334.html?title=theDiscourseAboutWordpress
@jautero @ianbetteridge I'm not saying I agree with the contents of the article. But I assume the https thing is a mistake. He uses https everywhere else including the domain I see him most often promoting. https://daveverse.org/2026/04/05/the-discourse-about-wordpress/
That said, I'm not sure https is necessary for every case especially now. What's more likely, a mitm attack on recipe site to change the ingredients' weights or an AI incorrectly parroting the contents?
No business should be without https though.
It's not a mistake.
https://this.how/googleAndHttp/
I wouldn't characterize HTTPS as solely a Google thing, myself.
But yes, as someone with an HTTP site, I can report that the bigger problem today is as you say #AI companies and their scrapers, not man-in-the-middle attacks. In fact, I've never suffered from the latter in quarter of a century. Whereas the scrapers and automated attacks are constant.
For examples:
Within the past couple of minutes, according to my logs, someone in AS8075 has attempted 130 WordPress vulnerability attacks on my HTTP machine. (For some reason, the attacker is using #Scunthorpe in the host name of the URLs. I kid you not.)
The large number of low-speed scrapers are a constant presence. And the last high-speed scraper was someone also from AS8075 who downloaded 210 pages from a single subdirectory in ~100 seconds on Good Friday afternoon.