Something I have trouble explaining about space travel. Like, if you've read my book, you know I think human space faring is probably not economically valuable. It's not a good use of science dollars compared to other areas. I'm even skeptical of the case for inspiration (it doesn't seem to causally related to more aerospace degrees).
But it's also just really cool. Why don't I feel this way about Antarctica or Seabed exploration?
@ZachWeinersmith Antarctic exploration *was* sexy 100-150 years ago, though! We kind of remember Captain Scott's ill-fated South polar expedition, but less so the ferocious international rivalry that drove it (or Norwegian explorer Roald Amundsen who got there first and survived).
In contrast, now we have Antarctic bases, familiarity breeds … boredom?
@cstross @ZachWeinersmith Perhaps unsurprisingly, here in Denmark we *do* remember Roald Amundsen. There are streets named after him and the like.
(But we have little if any cultural memory of Scott.)
@datarama @cstross @ZachWeinersmith Whereas here we have e.g. a statue of Scott
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statue_of_Robert_Falcon_Scott,_Christchurch
Interesting comparison :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_the_Amundsen_and_Scott_expeditions
@bigblen @cstross @ZachWeinersmith As far as I know there aren't any Amundsen statues in Denmark, but there are some in Norway. In Oslo, there's actually a monument with five statues, one of each of Amundsen's expedition members who reached the South Pole (including himself, of course).
I used to live just a couple of streets away from one of those streets named after him. When I was a kid and we learned about the history of polar exploration, we got a long story of Amundsen's expedition - and Scott got only a brief mention.
Zach Weinersmith
Charlie Stross
datarama
bigblen