RT @HedgieMarkets
🦔Google's plan to partly power a Texas data center through a 933-megawatt natural gas plant has been confirmed after Cleanview researchers uncovered the permit application. The plant would emit 4.5 million tons of carbon dioxide annually, more than the entire city of San Francisco. Google pledged carbon-free operations by 2030 in 2020, reported a 48% rise in emissions by 2024, and by 2025 had quietly reframed its climate commitments as climate moonshots, a term it uses for speculative projects that may or may not happen. Meta, Amazon, and Microsoft are making the same pivot.

My Take
The climate commitments these companies made were always going to last exactly as long as they were cheaper than the alternative. Google, Meta, Amazon, and Microsoft all pledged net-zero goals during a period when renewables were becoming cost competitive and climate leadership was good PR. AI changed the economics. The demand is too large, the timelines too short, and gas is available now. So the commitments are being quietly retired or reframed.

Google's head of advanced energy was asked directly last week how natural gas fits with the company's clean energy goals. His answer was we don't have anything to say on that. These were always profit-driven businesses. The climate commitments were real when they were also good business. They are becoming inconvenient and so they are going away.

Hedgie🤗

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/apr/02/google-ai-datacenter

Google to tap into gas plant for AI datacenter in sharp turn from climate goals

Texas power plant would emit 4.5m tons of carbon dioxide per year, more than that of the entire city of San Francisco

The Guardian
@remixtures They seem hell bent on destroying our planet and us.

@remixtures Yeah, its disappointing and predictable. Big tech is truly opportunistic, everything they do must be in their own interest.

If it is advantageous to put a rainbow flag on their building, they will do so. If next week it is advantageous to burn a rainbow flag, they will do so without hesitation.

@remixtures yes, profit rules. Never trust those marketing-driven statements, never.

But: that is why regulation is indeed needed. No harm with that - society setting the rules within profits can be made.
So, it‘s as much the fault of Texas (and the Trump administration) as of Google.