The red ahistorians are so fucking goddamn silly. They'll aggressively write Benjamin Tucker, Voltairine de Cleyre, Dyer D Lum, and all the french mutualist anarchists and american individualist abolitionist anarchists out of "anarchism" but then in the same fucking piece admit markets are a valid internal position within anarchism solely on the grounds that this fucking Trot turned Peronist was clearly a valid anarchist because he touched the CNT. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham_Guill%C3%A9n
Abraham Guillén - Wikipedia

@rechelon do you have a recommendation for a good book on anarchist history (with particular emphasis on different ideological currents and critical events over time)?

@AnarchoDoggo

Sadly not one with an emphasis on the different currents. Woodcock's book is the most influential, but he misrepresents things and has a strong pacifist bent. Robert's trilogy of compilations is really good but he's not really looking at ideological branching per se https://robertgraham.wordpress.com/anarchism-a-documentary-history-of-libertarian-ideas-volume-one-from-anarchy-to-anarchism-300ce-1939/

Anarchism: A Documentary History of Libertarian Ideas, Volume One: From Anarchy to Anarchism (300CE-1939)

Volume One of Anarchism: A Documentary History of Libertarian Ideas is subtitled From Anarchy to Anarchism to emphasize that before any anarchist doctrines arose people had been living in stateless…

Robert Graham's Anarchism Weblog