Electronic Frontier Foundation“Just labeling something as a design feature means nothing,” EFF’s @davidgreene told CNBC. “If it’s speech, it’s speech and it gets both First Amendment protection and potentially Section 230 protection as well.” https://www.cnbc.com/2026/04/03/meta-google-under-attack-court-cases-bypass-30-year-old-legal-shield.html
Sound_Waves@eff @davidgreene That's not what the case was about. It was about the algorithm, not the content. Those parents have hard evidence that when their children searched for one thing, those platforms showed them something totally different. What they WANTED to see was being hidden. That's the opposite of free speech.