"Giving money to J.K.Rowling is the same as giving money to eradicate transgender people. I'm sorry, but it's true."

allosaurusfragilis on tumblr

https://www.tumblr.com/allosaurusfragilis/812457516669747200/this-probably-isnt-going-to-change-peoples?source=share

@transworld its not, this is oversimplification, and its a fallacy.
You can *try* to avoid spending money places that support things you don't support, but you'll fail.
Example, Coca Cola has this many executives: https://www.coca-colacompany.com/about-us/leadership
Do you know what every one of them supports? Do you know how every one of them votes? Can you drink any of their products as a result?
Now do this with EVERY corporation.
People have to live their lives. You can support art and artists you don't agree with.
Our Executive Leadership Team | The Coca-Cola Company

Learn more about The Coca Cola Company Leadership team leading our efforts toward sustainable business and a better shared future.

@mikebabcock @transworld this isn't a fallacy though. "No ethical consumption under capitalism" doesn't mean "it's ok to spend money with this person actively funding the eradication of human of a certain category". The dog analogy is literally 1:1.

(Not talking to the transphobe but to anyone else reading; of course I blocked this asshole rather than attempt "discourse" with someone who's already made up they're mind that it's ok for people to die for their consumerism)

@vex @mikebabcock @transworld 1/4

jk rowling’s words and actions against trans people are truly awful. but the art/artist argument is real and complicated.

art becomes so much more than the artist. and yet the originator of something is paid the primary royalties.

if i enjoy the art, how do i reconcile that with the originator’s current actions?

i used to love hp. rn there’s so much other (better) fantasy i have discovered and fallen into. is complex

@theatremaker @vex @mikebabcock @transworld

Art and a human relationship to it is complex. Politics is very practical. You can possibly separate loving the art from the artist (if you can unsee what's under the surface of it), but you can't separate financially supporting the artist from the artist.