Imagine someone rewrote the Kama Sutra four times, and the final accepted version covered only masturbation.
Then you have a good understanding of the evolution of ISO 9001.
I wish I was joking.
Imagine someone rewrote the Kama Sutra four times, and the final accepted version covered only masturbation.
Then you have a good understanding of the evolution of ISO 9001.
I wish I was joking.
Feel free to read up on the history of the ISO 9000 series if you don't believe me:
@annaf As the Wikipedia article outlines, it started out perfectly reasonably: 3 norms, one for quality in design and production, one for quality in "just" production, and one for quality in inspection and test.
Then there was one iteration in which the focus shifted from detecting problems to preventing them. Fine.
But then it went off the rails, to where the only thing you can now get certified on is the QM *system*, so you get audited on the quality of the system to ensure quality. Nuts.