Sometimes I think that all the world's major problems emerge from one single meta problem: The concentration of power.

Democracies trying to get rid of smoking for 3 decades and failing? Concentration of power in the tobacco industry.

Putin being able to invade Ukraine? Concentration of power around Putin.

Trump being reelected because Musk had $250 million to throw at it? Concentration of power around Musk.

Iran war? Concentration of power in The White House.

Etc., etc., etc.

@randahl Exactly. The billionaire class is just the most extreme and visible example of this.

@randahl

In all those cases concentration of power = concentration of money.

Tax the ultra-wealthy worldwide.

@HikerGeek @randahl

Not always.

"If I owe someone a thousand dollars I have a problem. If I owe someone a billion dollars, they have a problem."

This is 50% of Trump's (and others') modus operandi. Of course, there may have been a concentration of money at some stage, but the concentration of power still exists even when it's spent, and is no longer taxable.

@electropict @randahl

Maybe you could give an example of what you are saying?

I can't think of any poor people or people in serious debt that have power.

@HikerGeek @randahl

If your read up on the history of Trump in particular you'll note that he has had far more debt than assets at different times. That's not the same as being poor. He's powerful enough to not pay his bills; poor people aren't. Another example would be AI companies currently, and several other tech companies over recent decades. They have almost no income, and massive debts, for long periods, but as long as they can keep their creditors on board, they remain powerful.

@HikerGeek @randahl There is a deeper problem in that we humans have not been able to effectively and sustainably check concentrations of wealth and power without murdering one another for... a pretty long time.
I think Dunbar's number has a lot to do with it...

@randahl

Personally I think that Trump is doing what he has done all his life.

Knowing that the justice system is slow Trump grills the person, if he do not break he offers a settlement. If he do not accept it Trump loose the case in a way that is not public and nobody understand what is happening.

If the person breaks, Trump settle and offer him a job, knowing that the person is weak and he can control him.

This is what Trump is calling "The Art Of The Deal"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N35IugBYH04

What is McCarthyism? And how did it happen? - Ellen Schrecker

YouTube
@randahl We let the psychopaths live. They keep falling ever upwards. Bodies pave their path, devastation left in their wake.
@randahl Interesting, but is it the root cause? Let's remember Trump was not the favorite candidate of the conservative establishment in 2015...
If I had to give one root cause for the West (there are many), I think it's not accepting that the miracle of the 1950's won't come back... which paved the way for populism.
@randahl "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely"
John Dahlberg-Acton
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Dalberg-Acton%2C_1st_Baron_Acton
John Dalberg-Acton, 1st Baron Acton - Wikipedia

@randahl
Yes, but it is also how you solve problems. It is what power is, the ability to do.

I’ve had many convos with American’s who would say “can’t because the power is at a different level of government.” Can’t change state as the rule is Federal. Can’t change local as its state. Can’t because it’s HMO contractual.

They couldn’t understand that the system wasn’t broken. I was talking about how the system is working as designed to maintain the status quo.

I am against throwing out the system but I wasn’t advocating for change through the system bottom up. I was advocating for reducing racism by changing the system top down.

For example, the first domino in preparing the way is to remove the filibuster. The hierarchy of law works this way. You can’t be held to a HMO if HMO’s are illegal.

@randahl Agreed but Musk threw $40B at Trump's reelection (with petrostate help).

@randahl

> Sometimes I think that all the world's major problems emerge from one single meta problem: The concentration of power.

Welcome to anarchism!