"Why can't Trump get his story straight about the nukes?"

No one on the CNN panel will *really* answer this question: Trump just ... says stuff.

Creates a kind of halting problem:

“We obliterated the regime’s nuclear program”
(but then there is no reason for war so he says)
"They are close to nuclear"
(but that sounds like we messed up so he says)
“We obliterated the nuclear program”
(but then there is no reason for war so he says)
♾️

etc.

It is surreal to watch people who are experts at using the English language, people whose whole profession and skill is centered on communication trying to parse the words this man speaks. Like someone investigating a splatter of bird poop as if it were tea leaves or art.

There is a cover story for why the US attacked Iran. One that is almost believable. The argument goes like this:

Iran was developing a drone and missile program rather like the Iron Dome that would make it "impossible" for the US to bomb them, and that would mean it's impossible to stop them if they wanted to make nuclear weapons. So they had to be stopped from doing this now.

Does Iran have the right to defend itself? It's an ugly argument.

Trump has said he will "bomb them back into the stone age" -- This is the solution they have. Cripple anyone who might become able to defend themselves. Every time I hear the phrase "bomb them back into the stone age" a little bile rises in my throat. I'm an American. How must this seem to the people of Iran. What will they vow to do because of our childish chauvinism?

This view of non-western countries is common. It will be our undoing.

But the other point, (which I got side-tracked from thinking about the phrase "bomb them into the stone age" ... ) is that the cover story I just articulated is too complex for Trump to even attempt to communicate. That is his diabolical populist instinct. He never confuses his base. Never uses big words or ideas.

Never makes them learn anything since for some people the feeling of learning makes them feel ... stupid.

And how do you unpack that? How do you deprogram someone from a place where learning things, and realizing how little they know is so horrible?

It's impossible to learn if you cannot admit that you do not already know everything you need to know about the world.

I think people *do* feel bad about what they don't know. Like not being able to find Iran on a map. That can feel embarrassing. But we can look at the maps. Read the history.

I think the shame and that can be induced by learning new things is tied to an essentialist and immutable view of what it means to be intelligent and wise.

For them "Intelligence" isn't something that you do, for these people it's something that you *are*

But this is false. To be intelligent you simply need to be open to learning new things every day. Willing to grow. That's it.

@futurebird Don't forget, they also grew up in a culture that abhors the concepts of intelligence.

There's the obvious of course: see the way "nerds" have been looked down on for a very long time now. And Hollywood, of course, helps promote that sentiment.

But also, I can tell you first-hand as just someone who couldn't fit in, seen as being more intelligent (regardless of whether I actually am) they just... *hate.* They don't even know why.