Niklas PivicI am not, according to the test. I agreed with 11% of tech-bro sentiments. Thank Bog.
\u2014lfr@pivic 11% on "disruption" because I agree that institutions sometimes must be replaced with something better, and "think about the jobs lost" is usually a strawman for subsidizing failing industries, i.e. the capital behind those, instead of securing workers directly throughout the transition.
In both cases I knew the answer would probably lead to a penalty. My idea of progress though is that you need to build another bridge first, according to code, before you can blow up the old one, obviously making sure nobody is still in its vincinity. That is, unless the existing bridge can actually be repaired and improved upon to serve its new and extended purposes, in which case keeping it should likely be preferrable, all things considered.
David Culley@ulfr I got 11% in total.
Because 5 years ago or so, I did try intermittent fasting for some time. And I do cut out sources of "cheap dopamine" and impulsive behavior. I also think going to the sauna is healthy, but I've never woken up at 4 AM to get my daily plunge in my ice bath as these self-proclaimed biohackers do.
And nobody needs industries like the crypto industry or the current LLM industry. Or the current form of our finance industry from which companies like Lehman Brothers or BlackRock emerged. Those industries need to be destroyed so that something better can emerge. I knew this question had a different answer in mind and answering it like that would penalize me. The question is aimed at finding out whether you would be fine with replacing a regulated industry such as the taxi industry with a completely unregulated gig economy that can be exploited by a company such as Uber. Similarly, the hotel industry and AirBnB.
Regarding the "progress inevitably leads to job loss, so job loss is a price we need to pay for the sake of progress", I disagreed with the word "inevitably". You cannot justify every firing workers with progress. You can very well have progress and keep your workers or give them something else to do.
I think 11% is already a good value. To get a lower value, some questions would probably need to be rephrased.
For context, for anyone else reading this:
- Andrew Huberman is associated with the fascist Balaji Srinivasan. He speaks at the Network State conferences.
- Peter Attia is in the Epstein files and was his doctor and friend. A lot of what Attia says is also plain wrong and a grift.