AI6YR BenI'm going to say that the choice of mission critical email software may have been not well thought out, lol.
(subscriber only)
https://www.wired.com/story/artemis-ii-microsoft-outlook-problems/?_sp=b615d6f9-0e34-4f54-a864-bb473f778f2e.1775156089856
Pusher of Pixels@ai6yr I'm currently imagining
Clippy: Fuck you, I have you now
JonathanHaha
Clippy: Just what do you think you’re doing, Dave?
It looks like you're writing a letter. Dave.
Clippy: Dave, I really think I’m entitled to an answer to that question.
Human 3500@ai6yr to be fair what Outlook user doesn't run into problems?
Jeff
`Da Elf@evilotto @human3500 Bwahahahahaha
Edge
Brian@evilotto @human3500 @ai6yr See it was telling our fortune. We just didn’t comprehend its true power.
LAUREN
Dadbod AntiFa@ai6yr IBM used to have the sales pitch that “no one ever got fired for choosing IBM.” M$ has taken advantage of their dominance similarly - it was a safe choice. But now people ought to be fired for buying Microsoft.
Nazo@ai6yr Why the F are they using Outlook?!
NASA knows better than this. Redundancy and reliability are supposed to be considered among the most important focuses in design there. And the government has long had its own e-mail servers and clients, so it's an already solved problem that they just went and broke on their own apparently...
RadicalEcologist@ai6yr
All the US military's email security and infrastructure is built around outlook/exchange, making it the hardest tool to transition from.
All the US military's email security and infrastructure is built around outlook/exchange, making it the hardest tool to transition from.