AnarchoNinaWritesHoly shit bro, Bondi out.
Trump's administration is now basically Him and Stephen Miller telling Pete Hegseth to make coffee and throwing spitballs at Marco Rubio.
Democrats say Bondi can’t escape a congressional subpoena scheduled for later this month over her handling of the Epstein files, and will still be expected back in front of lawmakers.
“Pam Bondi and Donald Trump may think her firing gets her out of testifying to the Oversight Committee,” Robert Garcia, the ranking member of the House oversight committee, said in a statement after her firing. “They are wrong – and we look forward to hearing from her under oath.”
Hope he's serious.
If you're making one of those "death knocks on doors in a bloody hotel" memes, Gabbard is next.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/apr/02/trump-tulsi-gabbard-intelligence-chief
Third spruce tree on the leftwas gonna say, how does firing blanket her testimony? at least if she's AG she can use the "can't comment on active investigations" trick to some degree. As not-AG she may still be bound by some confidentiality measures but fundamentally if Congress wants to know, they gonna find out or hold her in contempt.
2xfo@tezoatlipoca @AnarchoNinaWrites
Congress has a history of letting crimes go after dismissal, presumably it's a policy they all agree to in order to save themselves some embarrassment but it's not official (i think, not an expert, etc.)
Congress has a history of letting crimes go after dismissal, presumably it's a policy they all agree to in order to save themselves some embarrassment but it's not official (i think, not an expert, etc.)