Warning though: that 2nd link is a heavy minimizer at times:

there’s no indication that it’s any more dangerous or that it causes more severe disease than the COVID-19 variants that have circulated widely over the past few years. [2]

yeah well there's no indication it's any LESS dangerous than the rest which are ongoing costing us lives and healthspans, the trillion dollar a year economic loss, all the human cost from "about half" of healthcare workers with Long COVID, the double-digit general population with Long COVID, is there?

Still no indication it's mild, then, hm? None at all, zero? OK. Moving along.

[2] https://theconversation.com/covid-19-variant-ba-3-2-is-spreading-quickly-across-us-a-doctor-explains-what-you-need-to-know-279447

#COVID #COVID19 #SARSCoV2 #publichealth

Look, we have known for more than half a decade that COVID-19 is airborne, we shouldn't need to have this fight.

When an article gets something wrong to the point that it is dangerous to the public, that is the definition of a public danger. So when this piece https://theconversation.com/covid-19-variant-ba-3-2-is-spreading-quickly-across-us-a-doctor-explains-what-you-need-to-know-279447 says

First, wash your hands

if this bothers you too, you're welcome to complain until they correct (and to hopefully make their editors adjust to correct in future):

Corrections or complaints [email protected]

from https://theconversation.com/us/contact-us

#COVID #COVID19 #SARSCoV2 #COVIDISAirborne