given the claude code leak i'm starting to suspect that when boosters say they don't look at the code it's an act of fear, not confidence
@hynek Care to provide evidence? Have read quite a few articles, much about interesting architecture decisions. Nothing about poor quality.
@osmosisch @hynek Thanks, I‘ve seen that. Have seen plenty of production code in pre-AI times that has stuff like this. Wouldn‘t also say that the huge main file is a sign for bad AI coding… So, not convinced this reeks of poor AI code. Seems also this is what most comments say.
@osmosisch @hynek @Mastokarl johnny made a thread checking out some of the source code. Is not a complete write-up as that's titanic in scale but the examples given are really funny
https://neuromatch.social/@jonny/116324676116121930
jonny (good kind) (@[email protected])

- Claude code source "leaks" in a mapfile - people immediately use the code laundering machines to code launder the code laundering frontend - now many dubious open source-ish knockoffs in python and rust being derived directly from the source What's anthropic going to do, sue them? Insist in court that LLM recreating copyrighted code is a violation of copyright???

neurospace.live
@steppe_lord @osmosisch @hynek Some are wild. Others look very normal to me - the „make the model aware of common security issues“ or the fast regex for negative reactions instead of an expensive LLM call.