Europe is building data spaces.
Most implementations recreate the same centralisation problem โ with a European flag on top.
The alternative, built entirely on W3C open standards, already exists.
It just needs to be deployed.
๐งต
Europe is building data spaces.
Most implementations recreate the same centralisation problem โ with a European flag on top.
The alternative, built entirely on W3C open standards, already exists.
It just needs to be deployed.
๐งต
Gaia-X federation services โ W3C open standards:
๐ชช Identity & trust โ W3C DID + ODRL (did:wba sovereign identity)
๐ Sovereign data exchange โ SPARQL SERVICE (federated query, no replication)
๐ Federated catalogue โ DCAT2 (dataset catalogue per node)
โ
Compliance proof โ SHACL + PROV-O (validation + immutable audit)
No proprietary middleware. No central authority.
A data space built on a vendor platform is not a commons.
It is a commons with a landlord.
The landlord sets the rules.
The landlord can raise the rent.
The landlord can leave.
W3C open standards have no landlord.
SPARQL has no vendor.
PROV-O has no subscription fee.
Federated data spaces are not a product category.
They are a governance model โ and governance belongs to the commons, not to a platform provider.
Prisma is the implementation. The standards are the foundation.
Full post: blog.prisma-platform.eu/federated-data-spaces