Something I think about a lot is when I posted something on here critical of genAI, and soon after got a text from a very talented friend who I look up to saying that they had been thinking the same thing, but didn’t want to say anything publicly for fear of negatively affecting their career by criticising genAI.
@daisy now I'm wondering if I should start a business for "saying critical things about gen AI as a service" because apparently there's a market for it. 😆
@mike @daisy Saying things critical of AI is inevitable, so I guess it's on everyone to embrace it.

@daisy

I think you are onto something here!

I saw a presentation a couple years ago by some Amazon AI pitchman, where he was talking and had a slide up, about shitty science fiction movies of 20 years ago!

Robots, self-driving cars, and AI talking. Just stupid fiction, but familiar to us.

He compared those to recent hyped products, with a tone of triumph and certainty. Everyone will get a robot!

I had a sudden sick feeling:

"This is a really stupid cult."

Where refusal is forbidden.

@daisy You can count me in your wheelhouse.

@daisy I think it's quite possible and even reasonable to be critical (as in, "reflecting careful analysis and judgment ") of genAI.

I hope we can move into a timeline where nuanced discussion of the topic becomes the norm, instead of "Dueling Hot Takes/Unrepentant Shill/Doomerism" timeline we seem to be stuck in now.

@daisy This has real "Sign in the window that reads Workers of the World Unite" energy. You took your sign down. Your friend hasn't yet.
@daisy This concern is pretty widespread, from my perspective. (Anecdotal evidence only)