If you're an OpenBSD user and use vi instead of vim do you use the builtin n(vi) or nvi2 ?
https://github.com/lichray/nvi2
@justine i use the built in, but I also only use vi for admin tasks and simple edits. Beyond that, i end up in emacs and was never happy with nvim/tmux when fully kitted out as a terminal coding or doc writing environment.
Maybe you can relate, but I find a conflict between my drive for minimalism and simplicity in the composition of the system, and my direct appreciation of the system as a daily driver — how it makes me feel when I first sit down to work, and how it feels in hour 8 of work.
I found that prioritizing feel over minimalism and simplicity just a bit — keeps me happy
@justine I've stuck with the built-in vi on OpenBSD for most tasks. I miss some vim-isms (especially things like ci") but I don't think nvi2 would help with that.
I'd like to use emacs more (heathen) but I find that I end up tinkering with my setup more than doing productive work. The only time I've bemoaned the built-in's lack of utf-8 support was when I tried futzing around with my .XCompose file, but ibus has been a buggy pain in the ass, so even that's not much of a loss.
I don't use nvi2, but use a mix of stock vi, stock ed(1), and vim depending on the task.