I think in my #vi journey on #OpenBSD that I'm leaning towards #nvi as in nvi2. Only because I do use some nerd font stuff to pretty up some of my menus and my bar. But obviously that could change as I may get rid of those nerd fonts and just stick with plain text?
If you're an OpenBSD user and use vi instead of vim do you use the builtin n(vi) or nvi2 ?

https://github.com/lichray/nvi2
GitHub - lichray/nvi2: A multibyte fork of the nvi editor for BSD

A multibyte fork of the nvi editor for BSD. Contribute to lichray/nvi2 development by creating an account on GitHub.

GitHub

@justine i use the built in, but I also only use vi for admin tasks and simple edits. Beyond that, i end up in emacs and was never happy with nvim/tmux when fully kitted out as a terminal coding or doc writing environment.

Maybe you can relate, but I find a conflict between my drive for minimalism and simplicity in the composition of the system, and my direct appreciation of the system as a daily driver — how it makes me feel when I first sit down to work, and how it feels in hour 8 of work.

I found that prioritizing feel over minimalism and simplicity just a bit — keeps me happy

@justine I've stuck with the built-in vi on OpenBSD for most tasks. I miss some vim-isms (especially things like ci") but I don't think nvi2 would help with that.

I'd like to use emacs more (heathen) but I find that I end up tinkering with my setup more than doing productive work. The only time I've bemoaned the built-in's lack of utf-8 support was when I tried futzing around with my .XCompose file, but ibus has been a buggy pain in the ass, so even that's not much of a loss.

@[email protected] i decided to go with #openbsd builtin vi, but i understand it doesn't work for everyone.

@hi @justine

I've got both installed, but am leaning on trying to use the vi in base.

nvi2 because of umlauts
@[email protected] how do you type them in?
pressing a key on my swiss keyboard ;)
@justine For quick edits, base nvi is enough for me. I switch to Emacs for heavier work or prose (where I need Unicode occasionally), but if I was without Emacs then nvi2 would work just fine. I've kicked the tyres a little (debating a move myself) and I like it.
@justine mainly vi in base and nvi2 when specific characters are needed.

@justine

I don't use nvi2, but use a mix of stock vi, stock ed(1), and vim depending on the task.

I use the builtin vi and love it. It has a few updates that nvi
doesn't have. I have yet to need to type unicode, but I
know that if/when i do, i will need to use nvi2 or maybe
vis. I do keep my eye on editors and also am pretty good
with emacs so I am not worried. but surprisingly
OpenBSD's builtin vi has yet to let me down :)