Fabi
Jason LefkowitzYour session limit is still 5 hours. We've just changed the definition of what an hour is
https://x.com/trq212/status/2037254607001559305
(h/t @davidgerard)
Will Deakin@jalefkowit @davidgerard
à la vrai mode Rene, mon ami Claude tient à déclarer : « Ceci n'est pas une heure ! »
Steve Williams
Hoarse e-BooksBrough to you by Lorentz of Arabia
Patsy (she/her)I thought you were joking with your summary! That is wild
Fait partie des meubles@jalefkowit @davidgerard We are altering the deal, pray we do not alter it further.
Dogiedog64
The Orange Theme@jalefkowit @davidgerard Lmao slop surge pricing.
mcc@jalefkowit @davidgerard AI is so efficient you can fit more hours per hour
Glyph@mcc @jalefkowit @davidgerard more fingers per finger, more hours per hour, more crimes per war. surely there’s nothing it can’t do
Leon@jalefkowit @davidgerard @adrianh somehow the consensus I am hearing for Claude Code is simultaneously it is by far the best and most advanced agent for writing code ever and it’s a complete rip off that needs hundreds of dollars a month to approach adequate limits which are constantly being reduced arbitrarily
how is that a product
David Gerard
trisweb@davidgerard @leon @jalefkowit @adrianh digital uppers dispensed by a slot machine controlled by a roulette wheel. Pretty accurate.
katrina@leon @jalefkowit @davidgerard @adrianh
🤷🏻♀️ Well those two claims aren't mutually exclusive, just a statement about what the competition is like in comparison.
🤷🏻♀️ Well those two claims aren't mutually exclusive, just a statement about what the competition is like in comparison.
Michael Bacon@leon @jalefkowit @davidgerard @adrianh
At its current price, it's one of the few "AI" products which actually earns its fees for increased productivity in terms of code production. With enough cajoling, weird instructions, limits, and adequate testing frameworks, I think it does, ultimately, have a quite defensibly positive impact on code production. As a strong skeptic, this is one application of LLMs that, again, at current prices, is an actual legitimate productivity booster.
It is of course being offered at what's currently a 90% VC subsidy, and at full price that net cost gain almost certainly disappears. There's a small chance they can actually engineer something that's almost as effective and less expensive to run. But I'm not holding my breath.
Mx. Chara Aznable (they/them) of Pnictogen@MichaelTBacon @leon @jalefkowit @davidgerard @adrianh You're not a "strong skeptic" if you're burbling inanely about how the stochastic garbage generator is good at "code production"—i.e. it outputs trash faster than an unaided human being can, and that is therefore more "productive" by mere maximization of numbers.
If you'd like to be a REAL "strong skeptic", and not a performative fake one, you might start by asking yourself why you would ever trust a delicate task such as writing code (or any other difficult task) to an unintelligent device, designed to be unable to tell apart false information from truthful information (because that would slow the thing down), which is fraudulently being marketed as intelligent.
If you're such a skeptic why isn't your first concern with the fraud? But it's not, is it, Mikey? It's with mere numbers going upwards...i.e. "increased productivity", according to the braindead way in which tech professionals assess "productivity".
@MichaelTBacon and you proudly boast of your own social-media cowardice ("Currently block-happy. Too many dudes being basic in my mentions") so I don't expect a riposte from you, Mikey. do carry on, have a nice day, etc.
Christmas Tree@jalefkowit how is this not false advertising?
George BThis has the same energy as a note on a menu I saw once saying "in order to keep our prices low and comply with the new minimum wage, we will be adding a 8% surcharge to your bill"