I think a thing most people do not understand about chatbots is HOW SIMPLE THE UNDERLYING MODELS are.

It's really just statistics of how close words are to each other in a huge ass amount of written text, with a sprinkle of classification and labeling (done by humans).

And then it autocompletes your prompt. That's it, that's really all there is to it.

@thomasfuchs to the extent that computers are just large collections of on/off switches, yes. But those descriptions hide in both cases the tremendous tapestry of ideas and power that come from the master of how things connect with each other.
@Migueldeicaza I mean it’s essentially a very powerful search engine, with limitations due to the statistical nature of it.

@thomasfuchs yes it has limitations, but even the proximity is governed these days by very interesting and sophisticated systems - it is now very far from “what’s the most likely word given the words behind me”

Like video games that are just a pile of hacks combined, but are able to deliver an immersive experience - these piles of hacks amount to very useful tools.

@Migueldeicaza I guess what I’m saying is that just because it creates complex results it is not at all complex itself; it’s very easy to trick yourself into attributing more to it (e.g. sentience) than is actually there.

Which makes chatbots into perhaps useful but also highly dangerous tools.

@thomasfuchs I see what you mean - absolutely, some folks are really falling for it.