Mastodawn

NEW: I’ve found an opaque financial vehicle owns a large chunk of the Observer. And neither it or the Guardian will say who it is. Why? Well there is a clue. Which goes by way of Saudi Arabia… 1/ open.substack.com/pub/broligar...

The broligarchy's war on journ...

The broligarchy's war on journalism

The capture of US media by Trump allies is accelerating and the UK is the next in line. Plus: the mystery money behind my old newspaper.

How to Survive the Broligarchy

Show thread

Carole Cadwalladr 1d ago

The capture of US media orgs is accelerating. And the UK is next in line. The BBC has fallen to an AI hype guy. And my old newspaper, the Observer, is publishing Palantir puff pieces. But why? I have no idea. But in Companies House I found the Obs has a mystery investor: the North Hatley Trust. 2/

Show thread

Carole Cadwalladr 1d ago

Who is the North Hatley Trust? Good question! It’s a completely anonymous financial vehicle. And there’s just one clue from public info. Its legal address & HQ is Suite 5700, 415 Mission Street, San Francisco. Which also happens to be the HQ of private equity firm, Hellman & Friedman 3/

Show thread

Carole Cadwalladr 1d ago

I already knew Hellman & Friedman because of this guy. Patrick Healy, its CEO, is another investor in Tortoise Media/the Obs. It was a name that had alarmed us at the time. Because Hellman & Friedman invest money for the Saudi sovereign wealth fund. 4/

Show thread

Carole Cadwalladr 1d ago

And just so we’re clear about what that is & who’s behind it. It’s this guy: crown prince Mohammed Bin Salman. Aka Mr Bonesaw to you. The man the CIA concluded ordered the killing of journalist Jamal Khashoggi. 5/

Show thread

Carole Cadwalladr 1d ago

When James Harding presented his vision for the Obs in the Guardian office, I asked him whether Patrick Healy was a fit & proper person to own our newspaper given his firm’s investment from a renowned journalist killer. He assured us Healy had invested in a personal capacity only. 6/

Show thread

Carole Cadwalladr 1d ago

The chair of the Scott Trust - which owns the Guardian - Ole Jacob Sunde told press freedom groups the same thing. But why is an anonymous vehicle based at Hellman & Friedman’s offices being used to invest in the Obs? Who’s behind it? And - crucially why won’t the Obs or Guardian say? 7/

Show thread

Carole Cadwalladr 1d ago

Patrick Healy, Hellman & Friedman, the Observer & Ole Jacob Sunde did not respond to my press inquiries. The Guardian did respond but only to say it did not wish to comment. Why the secrecy? What’s there to hide? What is the North Hatley Trust? And who owns our oldest Sunday newspaper? 8/

a dirt road going through a de...

Show thread

Carole Cadwalladr 1d ago

I don’t know who’s behind the North Hatley Trust. Does the Guardian? It should. It’s a co investor. So why on earth would a liberal news org that champions accountability refuse to answer basic journalistic inquiries? It’s rupture of another important norm. 9/

Show thread

Carole Cadwalladr 1d ago

There may be a perfectly innocent explanation why the Observer is refusing to disclose the real identity of an opaque investor who happens to share an address with a private equity firm that’s taken a ton of cash from Mr Bonesaw… That’s why we send right to reply letters: to get the facts 10/

Show thread

Carole Cadwalladr 1d ago

It’s a pretty basic question. Does this guy own a chunk of our oldest Sunday newspaper @[email protected]. And why won’t you tell us @[email protected]? 11/

Show thread

Martin Vermeer FCD 1d ago

@carolecadwalla.bsky.social

> They also backdated the legislation to a year previously.

Wow! In a country that actually has a meaningful, written constitution, this would be _wildly_ unconstitutional. A bedrock principle of the rule of law is, that a citizen should be able to know the law as it applies, at any point in time. Retroactive laws, or as the US calls them, ex post facto laws, make that impossible.

Show thread

Dark Photon Studio 20h ago

@carolecadwalla.bsky.social Sounds bad, someone should do something.