#BA.3.2

So it seems really true that BA.3.2 preferentially infects small children or is particularly severe in small children:

Compare the early German BA.3.2 fraction size peak in mid December (figure @rv-enigma.bsky.social) to case number based incidence in the age groups.

7d incidence in the 0-4 age group almost reached the level seen in the much larger 2023-2024 wave.

Since the abandonment of testing in spring 2023, case numbers are mainly hospital-derived. Therefore, virulence and infection numbers cannot be discriminated with this measure.

Scotland saw a similar pattern with remarkably high hospital admissions in the age group 1-4 end of February (HT
@catlove40476297.bsky.social
). This seems to correlate with BA.3.2 fractions reaching high levels.

Variant figure: https://x.com/gwladwr/status/2032059098578006423?s=20

Hospital data:
https://scotland.shinyapps.io/phs-respiratory-covid-19/

In Swiss case numbers, 0-4 show higher incidences than 65+, lately. This was never seen since BA.1.

Not sure this fits to local BA.3.2 fraction sizes. It well might.

Case numbers will be mostly from severe/hospital. They are currently lowest ever since the advent of Omicron.

@dominiksteiger Speakin of which: bad news, something failed in the sequencer, it only produced a ridiculously low amount of reads, so new drop of data this week.
@dryak Ah sorry to hear! In Austrian devoncolutions, it certainly is around quite some (in contrast to German clinical specimens). Abs. prev. is very low - the error bars are prob. very large.