Mar 19, 1951 TIME Assassin Tahmassebi is a carpenter, a reader of the Koran in the mosque, a member of a small xenophobic sect called Fadayan Islam (Crusaders of Islam) which, with fine impartiality, has been denouncing Truman, Stalin and Britain’s George VI.
Washington and London regarded Tahmassebi as a mere triggerman; the real instigator was assumed to be Ayatulla Kashani, head of Fadayan Islam and a member of a twelve-man “National Front” in the Majlis (parliament).
https://time.com/archive/6795434/iran-for-oil-islam/

P Toynbee article linking Iran importance to her mil weakness; USSR aggression seen deterred only by fear of gen war; map; illus

An in-depth historical analysis of Mohammad Mossadegh’s leadership, Iran’s oil nationalization, the 1953 coup, and the enduring struggle for national sovereignty and independence.
Mar 22, 1951 NYT Britain reaffirmed today her vital interest in the independence, integrity and security of Iran where martial law has been proclaimed because of disturbances accompanying a campaign to nationalize British oil interests there.
The Government was studying the precedent set by the British Government in appealing to the League of Nations in 1932 when the Iranian Government tried to annul the British oil concession. The Teheran Government, Lord Henderson said, has not replied to Britain's note warning against nationalization of the oil business as proposed by the Iranian Parliament.
https://www.nytimes.com/1951/03/22/archives/britain-stresses-concern-over-iran-morrison-reaffirms-interest-in.html

When the U.S. State Department received an invitation from the Iranian Athletic Association that proposed a diplomatic soccer tour of the country in early spring of 1951, government officials reached out to the national champion Nittany Lions first.
Mar 23, 1951 #ColdWar NYT Martial law has been proclaimed in Teheran to hold in check the fanatical anti-foreign forces that assassinated the late Prime Minister. These reactionary forces are in control of the Majlis. They are fanned to flame in the name of “revolution” by the Communist party, outlawed but engineering public demonstrations.
Iran's position is so vulnerable that in this case expropriation of the oil industry is not a step toward but away from the independence ruler and people passionately desire. It would inevitably increase Russian pressure and power in an area both the Czars and the Politburo have always coveted.
https://www.nytimes.com/1951/03/23/archives/the-stake-in-iran.html

on problem created for GB
Mar 26, 1951 TIME Some extremists in Teheran demanded the nationalization of American oil holdings on Bahrain Island in the Persian Gulf. Iran has not exercised effective sovereignty over Bahrain for a century and a half. Since 1880 the island has been a virtual British protectorate.
From Cairo came reports of a move in the Egyptian Parliament to nationalize the Suez Canal, dug by and operated by a French company in which the British government now owns about 44% of the stock.
https://time.com/archive/6608266/iran-whose-ox-is-nationalized/

Brit and US groups led by Amb Franks and Asst Sec McGhee conf; ask Iran to settle issue amicably; cite nations past aid to Iran; Amb Entezam conf with McGhee; sees little chance of reversing nationalizing ruling; Anglo-Iranian co weighs new proposals; atmosphere seen more favorable

Vice President JD Vance told reporters that "we have not reached an agreement" following face-to-face talks with Iranian leaders and Pakistani negotiators.
Apr 18, 1951 NYT The Iranian Foreign Ministry tonight accused the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company of complicity in fomenting strikes and outbreaks of violence that forced the company's giant Abadan refinery to shut down.
Dr Ahmed Ali Ansari, head of the Ministry Information Section, also took occasion to scold foreign correspondents for having sent what he called distorted and tendentious reports on recent events in Iran.
https://www.nytimes.com/1951/04/18/archives/iran-holds-british-fomented-strikes-accuses-angloiranian-oil-of.html

Iran charges Anglo-Iranian co with role in fomenting strikes and violence; scores foreign newsmen for allegedly slanted repts; Abadan situation worse; Govt holds workers demands legitimate; Sec Acheson defends US-GB talks
May 1, 1951 NYT The bill, unanimously passed by the Majlis or lower House Saturday, will become operative when issued under the Shah's hand and seal. The sovereign has no veto power.
The British contention that the 1933 concession could not legally be denounced by unilateral action was unfounded, Dr. Mossadegh maintained, since that agreement had been obtained under duress and threat of force.
https://www.nytimes.com/1951/05/01/archives/iran-senate-votes-oil-nationalizing-acts-unanimously-after-new.html