Mastodawn

I’ve proposed an Accessibility Law of Headlines:
https://adrianroselli.com/2026/03/accessibility-law-of-headlines.html

Any headline that asserts a thing is accessible is wrong.

There. Now you don’t need to read it (my post nor one making a BS claim).

Accessibility Law of Headlines

Betteridge’s law of headlines states that any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the word no. For at least the digital accessibility landscape, I would like to amend it, fork it, whatever it: Any headline that asserts a thing is accessible is wrong. Yes, that…

Adrian Roselli

Show thread

Adrian Roselli, pH0 1d ago

I shared this on LinkedIn because I find LinkedIn is particularly pernicious in promoting problematic posts.
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:share:7442940260495425537

Accessibility Law of Headlines | Adrian Roselli

Sharing here because I find LinkedIn is particularly pernicious in promoting problematic posts. Accessibility Law of Headlines https://lnkd.in/euG7HMYJ To spare you the click: "Any headline that asserts a thing is accessible is wrong."

Show thread

Caroline Kinlund 1d ago

@aardrian please also note the casual association of trans people to LITERALLY Hitler all the way back in the 80s

Show thread

Adrian Roselli, pH0

@caroline Oh, that entire issue is full of homo- and transphobic content, including the wedding headline I cropped on the cover. There’s even a ‘letter to the editor’ calling it out.

Other issues have easily as much.

That thing was trash.