Strypey10h ago

'It's fine to use corporate platforms for journalism and activism that goes against their owners ideological biases or political-economic interests. What's the worst that could happen?'

"A Journalist Reported From Palestine. YouTube Deleted His Account Claiming He’s an Iranian Agent."

https://theintercept.com/2025/12/07/youtube-deleted-journalist-israel-palestine-censorship/

These platforms are owned by technofascists. By choosing to publish there, when you have options, you choose to do unpaid work for fascist media;

https://berjon.com/fascintern-media/

#TheIntercept

A Journalist Reported From Palestine. YouTube Deleted His Account Claiming He’s an Iranian Agent.

YouTube offered conflicting explanations for deleting the account of Robert Inlakesh, who covered Israel’s occupation of the West Bank.

The Intercept
Show threadLight7h ago
@strypey
IMO it's good so long as you publish on a safe site as well. And direct your viewers there.
Otherwise, you might be forfeiting that audience.
Show threadLight6h ago
@strypey We should also as viewers and readers keep backups in case of such censorship.
Show threadLight
@strypey Also, this is an interesting talk:
Digital Due Process
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXe-rvXVL-g
Casey Muratori (@MollyRocket ) - Digital Due Process

YouTube
3:58pmWeb