@EricFielding @mhoye Maybe base it on maximum market cap in the past three decades, adjusted for inflation.
And none of the 2% stuff. Try more like 90%, payable from actual individual people, not corporate coffers. The punishment needs to affect individual human beings, to be a threat to the actual human beings who make the decisions.
@mhoye Sliding scale fines but for corporations
Then maybe we can talk about the death penalty for corporations
@mhoye It's an incredibly basic point to make, but if a company made more money with a crime than they have to pay in fines, then that crime is worth it.
It's just a tax on crime, but not in any way an incentive to stop doing crimes. It makes business-sense to keep doing the crime.
@mhoye
EU-GDPR allows for the following, however as most big-tech is based in Ireland, which is plagued by biased/susceptible officials, no serious fines have yet come to fruitition > https://www.heise.de/en/news/Ireland-Former-meta-lobbyist-becomes-data-protection-officer-10661910.html
Tier 1:
Up to €10 million OR 2% of total worldwide annual turnover from the preceding financial year, whichever is higher
Tier 2:
Up to €20 million OR 4% of total worldwide annual turnover from the preceding financial year, whichever is higher
Tier 1 (Less Serious Violations):
Applies to violations such as: record-keeping failures, inadequate security measures, insufficient data protection impact assessments, and certain processor obligations
Tier 2 (More Serious Violations):
Applies to violations such as: violations of core data processing principles (lawfulness, fairness, transparency), unlawful data transfers, infringement of data subject rights, and non-compliance with orders from supervisory authorities
@mhoye and the fine needs to be *after* they forfeit all revenue they made by violating whatever the fine was for in the first place. Otherwise it can still be worth it.
And of course, all the execs who directed the organization to break the law need to be criminally prosecuted too.
Another minimum value: the fine should be a multiplier on the maximum estimate of money saved/gained by breaking the law.