Agree completely.
I would like to add how in addition of something being harmful, there's also *identifying* something as harmful to us/community/society/etc. AND being in a position to do something about it.
Is Rowling more harmful than petrol cars (for society, community/environment)? Certainly not, but it's easier to opt out from Rowling, and not buying books is legal unlike blowing oil pipes.
½
2/2
At the same time I would hope people would ne reasonable with their dislikes. Sometimes these things get separated from their roots and start living their own life.
See: shit piled upon the non-binary author SenLinYu for having written a story that started its life as a Harry Potter -fanfiction. Rowling didn't get a cent from that, and in general I do think it's a good thing when characters gain indepdence from their creators.
3/2
(
Also there's something to be said how copyright is de facto assumed to cover scenarios, character names or characterisation, etc. It doesn't. And trademark is about first-party marketing, not content or way-of-mouth.
But this is separate topic.
)
Crystal Mountain Records
Juho Mäntysalo