@ramsey I think the argument was, once they media industry proves a connected user is an infringer, the ISPs become cohorts if they don't take action. They won a billion dollars up through the appeals process but now SCOTUS overturned all of that.
My post has the cover ruling . https://oldfriends.live/@paul/116290486627454288
@paul @ramsey @newsguyusa kinda like #OCILLA & #SafeHarbour regulations re: #Copyright|ed materials and #hosting only shield the provider from liability unless they knew about said acts…
@ramsey Yeah.
17 U.S.C. § 512(c)(3)(A). Upon receipt of a complaint takedown notice, a service provider must respond expeditiously to remove, or disable access to, the material that is claimed to be infringing or to be the subject of the infringing activity. If a service provider fails to do so, it may lose its safe harbor protection and be subject to an infringement suit.
It's also worth noting, unless a website registers a DMCA agent with the copyright office, one really isn't protected as people can claim they sent takedowns.
https://www.copyright.gov/dmca-directory/
@kkarhan @newsguyusa